> On 2011-08-14 06:29, [email protected] wrote:
> ...
> > I really have to wonder if the entire yes/no-obj/discuss voting model is
> > appropriate for document advancement. For initial approval at proposed,
> > sure,
> > having the ability to "discuss" the document makes all sorts of sense. But
> > for subsequent steps that virtue is a lot obvious, to me at least.
> s/lot/lot less/
Yes, sorry.
> I pretty much agree, although one form of discuss might be
> reasonable: "This document needs to be recycled at Proposed
> Standard because of the following *observed* interoperability
> problem:...".
> In other words, once we have got this BCP out (soon, please),
> the IESG should update the DISCUSS criteria specifically to
> narrow them for the PS->IS transition.
+1
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
