Alessandro, Stewart and all,
I concur with Stewart: please write a draft detailing your major technical
concerns.
I'd like to add a quote from Malcolm's presentation at the IETF meeting in
Prague:
"Differences <between the solution approved by the IETF and its ITU-T
sponsored alternatives - Sasha> are close to invisible at the level of
the requirements in RFC5860".
Just to remind you that RFC 5680 is the MPLS-TP OAM requirements document.
Malcolm has also said:
"Many of the issues only become apparent when the protocol and
equipment behavior is explored"
but, AFAIK, these issues have never been explicitly brought for the
consideration.
My 2c,
Sasha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Stewart Bryant
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:24 PM
> To: D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mpls] R: FW: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-
> considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for
> MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC
>
> On 05/10/2011 10:38, D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo wrote:
> > major unresolved technical concerns
>
> Alessandro
>
> Please can I suggest that you write an internet draft detailing
> these "major unresolved technical concerns" so that we
> can all understand them.
>
> Such a draft needs to be technical, and describe the actions
> that the network operator is unable to perform, or the fault
> cases that they are unable to diagnose using the OAM defined
> in the IETF RFCs, or late stage WG drafts.
>
> Alternatively if you are referring to a bug in the MPLS-TP
> OAM protocols, you need to tell the community what it is.
>
> I believe that this request has been made a number of
> times, in various forums, and, as far as I know, no document
> has yet been produced.
>
> An argument of the form "you must standardize what I want"
> will not fly. What is needed is a very clear technical definition
> of the issue(s).
>
> When we have the "major unresolved technical concerns"
> on the table, we will be in a position to determine the best
> disposition of those issues.
>
> Stewart
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> For corporate legal information go to:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information
which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have
received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax,
and then delete the original and all copies thereof.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
