Cool idea.  I would hang out if other people did.

+1 to using protocols other than email for ephemeral discussions such as these 
:)  

--Richard


On Oct 28, 2011, at 5:03 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:

> On Wed Oct 26 17:30:04 2011, John C Klensin wrote:
>> As others have pointed out, that doesn't solve the "water
>> cooler" problem.  It would probably require some rethinking of
>> how we handle BOFs, WG creation, and other tasks.
> 
> Creating a virtual water cooler is possible - XMPP chatrooms do provide this 
> pretty well - but there's a cultural shift required that requires effort to 
> put into place.
> 
> I think we could probably get this going to some degree if we [for any value 
> of we] simply stated that we'd hang about in the relevent chatrooms. For me 
> (being a woolly apps kind of guy) that'd presumably be 
> [email protected] and [email protected] - I note there's even 
> people in the latter.
> 
> Any reasonable XMPP client will include support for automatically joining 
> chatrooms. For anyone here interested, it's "Bookmarks" - XEP-0048, typically 
> stored in XEP-0049, for which you'll need server-side support - GTalk won't 
> quite cut it, I'm afraid.
> 
> These things need a critical mass - a solid group of regulars in the chatroom 
> who're willing to basically hang around and chat - but it's possible, and - I 
> think - worthwhile whatever we do. So I've just bookmarked said rooms with 
> auto-join to see what happens.
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
> - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
> - http://dave.cridland.net/
> Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to