On 2012-02-15 09:35, Randy Bush wrote: >> Do you, or do you not, object to the proposed change that changes the >> text from saying, "This space may be used just as 1918 space" to "This >> space has limitations and cannot be used as 1918 space"? > > what silliness. it will be used as rfc 1918 space no matter what the document > says.
Of course it will. My suggestion was to change the text to "is not intended to be used" instead of "can be used", hoping that would be viewed as a fair warning. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg71596.html Brian > > nine years ago i was in bologna and did a traceroute out. i was surprised > to find that the isp was using un-announced us military space as rfc 1918 > space internal to their network. this turns out to be common. > > any thought that this is not just adding to rfc 1918 is pure bs. > > randy > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
