20 jul 2012 kl. 16:09 skrev "Richard L. Barnes" <rbar...@bbn.com>:

> +1
> 
> Although I wonder whether radical openness would be cheaper in the long run: 
> Put everything online and have an auto-responder at subpo...@ietf.org that 
> says "Go look it up yourself."
> 

I could think of some other things it could say too...

> --Richard
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:07 AM, IETF Administrative Director wrote:
>> 
>>> The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed policy by the IAOC to 
>>> impose 
>>> fees to produce information and authenticate documents in response to 
>>> subpoenas and 
>>> other legal requests.
>>> 
>>> The IETF receives requests for information, documentation, authentication 
>>> or other 
>>> matters through subpoenas and less formal means that require manpower and 
>>> materials 
>>> to be expended.  These requests are on the rise. During the period 2005 to 
>>> 2010 the IETF 
>>> responded to nine subpoenas.  Since 2011 the IETF has received five 
>>> subpoenas and three 
>>> other legal requests for authenticated documents.  
>>> 
>>> Each such request is time sensitive and involves the IETF Counsel, the IAD, 
>>> and members 
>>> of the IAOC, who together form the Legal Management Committee, to rapidly 
>>> analyze and 
>>> identify the means for satisfying the request.  Often there is a need to 
>>> retain outside counsel, 
>>> especially in cases that might lead to depositions or court testimony. 
>>> 
>>> The IAOC believes a Schedule of Fees is an appropriate and reasonable means 
>>> to recover 
>>> costs associated with such efforts.
>>> 
>>> The draft policy entitled Draft Fee Policy for Legal Requests can be found 
>>> at: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html>
>>> 
>>> Before adopting a policy the IAOC would like feedback on this before making 
>>> a 
>>> decision.  Comments appreciated to ietf@ietf.org by 6 August 2012.
>>> 
>>> Ray Pelletier
>>> IETF Administrative Director
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> LGTM++.
>> 
>> Seems like a grand idea -- who knows, may even help avoid nuisance suits 
>> (although the fees are so small (compared to all the other costs) that I 
>> don't hold much hope of this…).
>> 
>> W
>> 
>> --
>> For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and 
>> wrong.
>>               -- H. L. Mencken
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to