So it is ok to have bad ideas as I+D, possibly harmful for the Internet
just to have a structured discussion?
Regards,
as
On 02/12/2012 18:21, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 12/2/12 11:18 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>
>> In Section 2.1, I would add in specifically-inappropriate criteria:
>>
>> - Accept an I+D for the merely fact to have a more structured
>> discussion in the WG.
>
> I'm actually not sure about that. It seems to me that in the past
> we've had working group documents which were not intended for
> publication, and I think they'd fall under this criterion. I may
> be misremembering. At any rate I'm not sure I see the value in
> ruling these out.
>
> Melinda
>
