On 02/12/2012 21:50, Randy Bush wrote:
>> So it is ok to have bad ideas as I+D, possibly harmful for the Internet
>> just to have a structured discussion?
> and so that the chairs have the option of changing editorship to turn
> them into good ideas.
>
> randy
That's is true. But I would prefer to accept a I+D as WG item until
we are sure that we are somehow committed to follow the path
described/proposed in the document. Accepting the document assuming that
chairs are going to turn bad ideas to good in my opinio is not good.
Regards
as
