> I would prefer to have the I+D as non-wg item until we are sure that we > are willing to support it as RFC.
i thought that was wglc. but i am a dinosaur. randy
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: &quo... Dave Crocker
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: ... Barry Leiba
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was ... Dave Crocker
- RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IET... Adrian Farrel
- Creating an IETF Working Group Draft Dave Crocker
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft Arturo Servin
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft Melinda Shore
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draf... Arturo Servin
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group... SM
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Arturo Servin
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Randy Bush
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Arturo Servin
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Randy Bush
- Re: Creating an IETF Working Group... Randy Bush
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Arturo Servin
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Melinda Shore
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Arturo Servin
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Melinda Shore
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Creating an IETF Working G... Russ Housley
- RE: Creating an IETF Working G... Adrian Farrel
