would this mandate wearing badges only in certain locations, e.g. over the left breast?
/bill On 6August2013Tuesday, at 23:26, Riccardo Bernardini wrote: > Just thinking out aloud.... > > What about a web-cam (maybe a wireless one? Never tried to use > them...) right under the mic, so that it takes a picture of the badge > and shows it on the screen? Everyone (right?) in a meeting has a > badge wit his/her/its :) name and affiliation, so privacy concerns > are just comparable to those of wearing a badge. > > Of course, this is not applicable to jabber participants, in that case > you need a different solution. > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Henning Schulzrinne <h...@cs.columbia.edu> > wrote: >> Yes, a group from my lab did this, using short-range RFID. (The range was >> about 1-2 inches.) It required a bit of a setup which made it hard to >> replicate at scale, but it worked reasonably well. >> >> Privacy concerns are an issue, but you'd have to be very close to the person >> to sense the card (and you can obviously leave it behind any time you'd want >> to) - it would be much more convenient to track people using BlueTooth or >> WiFi MAC addresses, if you'd be so inclined, or just use video cameras. Yes, >> you can use long-range directional antennas to increase your read range, but >> those would be rather hard to hide. As was mentioned, the hotel room cards >> use very much the same technology, and you can't really leave them behind >> when you leave the building. >> >> Henning >> >> On Aug 5, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Dan York <y...@isoc.org> wrote: >> >>> On the topic of badge-sensing at the mic, I seem to recall that we had this >>> working at an IETF sometime back in the RAI working groups. It was maybe 4 >>> or 5 years ago and I think it may have been some student(s) under Henning >>> Schulzrinne at Columbia... but I am not sure about that. I remember that >>> when you went to the mic you put your badge up to this sensor and your name >>> appeared in the jabber room. We used it in several of the RAI sessions at >>> that IETF. Unfortunately I don't remember how well it worked or why it >>> wasn't continued. There may be someone out there who can provide some >>> insight. (And if it was Henning's students we can just drop him a note.) >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> -- >>> Dan York >>> y...@isoc.org >>> +1-802-735-1624 >>> skype:danyork >>> http://twitter.com/danyork >>> >>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 10:26 AM, "Paul Aitken" <pait...@cisco.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've remotely participated in several IETFs. >>>> >>>> I find that the biggest problem with remote attendance is the lack of >>>> visual cues. I've come to realise just how important these are in a >>>> meeting. >>>> -are people paying attention, are they interested / confused / distracted >>>> / bored? >>>> >>>> Also there's no way for local attendees (in the WG room) to know that >>>> remote attendees are "at the mic" and whose turn it is to speak. >>>> >>>> There's been some discussion on the "87attendees" mailer about badge >>>> sensing at the mic - whether QR codes, NFC, or RFID. This could help >>>> remote attendees too. >>>> >>>> eg, see what they did with NFC + mic here: >>>> http://www.5thbar.me/blog/2012/09/14/nfc-enabled-badges-at-the-5thbar-mobile-marketing-forum/ >>>> >>>> P. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> iaoc-rps mailing list >>>> iaoc-...@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iaoc-rps >>> >>