Just thinking out aloud....

What about a web-cam (maybe a wireless one? Never tried to use
them...) right under the mic, so that it takes a picture of the badge
and shows it on the screen?  Everyone (right?) in a meeting has a
badge  wit his/her/its :) name and affiliation, so privacy concerns
are just comparable to those of wearing a badge.

Of course, this is not applicable to jabber participants, in that case
you need a different solution.

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Henning Schulzrinne <h...@cs.columbia.edu> 
wrote:
> Yes, a group from my lab did this, using short-range RFID. (The range was 
> about 1-2 inches.) It required a bit of a setup which made it hard to 
> replicate at scale, but it worked reasonably well.
>
> Privacy concerns are an issue, but you'd have to be very close to the person 
> to sense the card (and you can obviously leave it behind any time you'd want 
> to) - it would be much more convenient to track people using BlueTooth or 
> WiFi MAC addresses, if you'd be so inclined, or just use video cameras. Yes, 
> you can use long-range directional antennas to increase your read range, but 
> those would be rather hard to hide. As was mentioned, the hotel room cards 
> use very much the same technology, and you can't really leave them behind 
> when you leave the building.
>
> Henning
>
> On Aug 5, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Dan York <y...@isoc.org> wrote:
>
>> On the topic of badge-sensing at the mic, I seem to recall that we had this 
>> working at an IETF sometime back in the RAI working groups. It was maybe 4 
>> or 5 years ago and I think it may have been some student(s) under Henning 
>> Schulzrinne at Columbia... but I am not sure about that.  I remember that 
>> when you went to the mic you put your badge up to this sensor and your name 
>> appeared in the jabber room. We used it in several of the RAI sessions at 
>> that IETF. Unfortunately I don't remember how well it worked or why it 
>> wasn't continued. There may be someone out there who can provide some 
>> insight. (And if it was Henning's students we can just drop him a note.)
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan York
>> y...@isoc.org
>> +1-802-735-1624
>> skype:danyork
>> http://twitter.com/danyork
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 10:26 AM, "Paul Aitken" <pait...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've remotely participated in several IETFs.
>>>
>>> I find that the biggest problem with remote attendance is the lack of 
>>> visual cues. I've come to realise just how important these are in a meeting.
>>> -are people paying attention, are they interested / confused / distracted / 
>>> bored?
>>>
>>> Also there's no way for local attendees (in the WG room) to know that 
>>> remote attendees are "at the mic" and whose turn it is to speak.
>>>
>>> There's been some discussion on the "87attendees" mailer about badge 
>>> sensing at the mic - whether QR codes, NFC, or RFID. This could help remote 
>>> attendees too.
>>>
>>> eg, see what they did with NFC + mic here: 
>>> http://www.5thbar.me/blog/2012/09/14/nfc-enabled-badges-at-the-5thbar-mobile-marketing-forum/
>>>
>>> P.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> iaoc-rps mailing list
>>> iaoc-...@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iaoc-rps
>>
>

Reply via email to