On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:44:39 +1200, Tim Uckun wrote: >> Hi, >> >> www.ifolder.com says: >> - Mar 28th: ifolder 3.6 available >> - May 2nd: ifolder *server* 3.6 available > > There is no stable release of ifolder. There hasn't been one since some
Which the client, or the server? Please don't fall into the same trap I specifically asked about. > If you want 3.6 your best bet is probably the source code but that And if you had seen my emails, you would have noticed that I am actually using that. But that multiple places "claim" to have the source. Can anyone say which one is canonical? > If you want > to play with it then go the subversion and try to build it. If you are > running a novell linux then you can try the RPMs. Sigh. All this verbiage when all that is wanted is someone to say: - here is the canonical location of the Subverion tree. - here is the canonical location of the source code tarballs. > this path. Definitely not for production use. I have been using it in production for over a year. Whilst there is not much communication on the mailing list, there does appear to be activity, now and then, on the IRC channel. Anand _______________________________________________ ifolder-dev mailing list [email protected] http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/ifolder-dev
