Archive *is* open to non-members:
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.games.igaming is an archive of this
mailing list.

You can also use http://irishgamingwiki.com/planet/ which includes the
feed for this archive and a number of other irish gaming based sites
(including the irishgaming.com forums).

On 13/02/07, artwolfirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyway to keep the membership moderated but have the archive
> open to non members?
>
> John
>
> --- In [email protected], "Anton Sweeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You click on the irishgaming group on Yahoo and get told membership is
> > moderated.  Joining is still a single click away and a Yahoo ID
> isn't even
> > required.  This is still a lot simpler than signing up to a forum, for
> > example.  joebloggs @ somecollege.com or marybloggs @ irishISP.com or
> > whatever will likely be approved within a few hours, while
> > stringofrandomletters @ someforeignTLD.tw doesn't - at least till a
> mod sees
> > that their posts aren't spam.
> >
> > Meanwhile, those who *don't* like spam are less likely to unsub from
> a list
> > that's no longer bothered by it.
> >
> > Any community benefits from being open to new people, especially online
> > (exception: the Amish) but none benefit from having a reputation of
> letting
> > your inbox get filled with spam.
> >
> > Just my two cents,
> >
> > Anton
> >
> > On 2/13/07, Cian O' Rathaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >   I am firmly against this.
> > > the gaming community benifits from being open to new people.
> > > and though this may not be the first stop for people, there are
> those who
> > > come here to find out new things, it being easier for them is a good
> > > thing.
> > >
> > > but then i guess the spam is not an issue for me.
> > >
> > > -Cian
> > >
> > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Brian Nisbet wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:30:33PM -0000, Richard Phillips wrote:
> > > > > > The theory is to change membership from open to requiring
> > > > > > approval, something that I could quite happily handle very
> > > > > > quickly. This would stop the couple of spams that are sent
> > > > > > out before I ban the offending email address.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do people reckon?
> > > > >
> > > > > Sounds very sensible.
> > > >
> > > > And other such comments, thank you all.
> > > >
> > > > Right, I think that's enough concensus for one afternoon.
> > > >
> > > > This change has been made, if anything goes horribly wrong
> > > > then it's only a moment's work to change it back.
> > > >
> > > > B.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
http://thedeadone.net
http://irishgamingwiki.com

Reply via email to