> Disagreements are not the concern here. I think what Satyaa meant was to > delegate responsibilities. Why have everything dependent on one person ... > share responsibilities. > Quoting Satya " what if god forbid someone passes away , so my point was to > have a fail safe mechanism."
IMHO, IITD-LUG does not seem to have any point of failure. It is very active and visible community. We need to just let the existing system evolve. The worst case can happen anytime anywhere. We need to look how TCP handles congestion :) > > What's the whole point in the Life Insurance system? Everybody is reluctant > to even think about a member of their family passing away, yet they have to > think about such extremes and plan what will happen when they are gone. Its > not that the family expects the head to pass away... its just a > precautionary measure. > IMHO, certainly a very bad example. I have never seen such an expression of concern about delegating tasks and need for better process. I request, please think before writing. @Narendra, We wish you a happy married life and all the best for future. Mohit Singh -- LUG@IITD - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm
