hia, hmmmph...i agree again someone please make a nice little table with advantages/disadvantages in two columns..or rather, make 2 such tables, one for the old setup, one for the new. i could have done this myself, but my knowledge of hosting and server setup and network does not go much beyond the very elementary basics. this has to be done fast as we need to have a sort of consensus among the *at least* active members before the meeting, otherwise there will be nothing except wugga-wugga-server-wugga-wiim-old-server-wuggua-gu-mu-nu-beta-wugga-blah-blah at the meeting :) as for the meeting, yes, i'll be there (though i might be a little late in showing up..i have a chemistry tuition to attend) and about siddharta-da's proposal about that committee, i wud gladly help, but for technical intricacies, better leave me out. all i can *try* to do is perform routine updates, and providing content, and a bit of log monitoring 'n stuffs like that... -cheerio- -sdg-
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 10:48, Siddhartha Basu wrote: > Hi, > It is quite evident that we have to make decision > about the server. More precisely, whether we keep it > in the old place or shift it to the newer one. > However, a test drive of the currently proposed and > installed server is a prerequisite for that. > So my question is what will be criteria to test the > same web site in two different server. And what will > be other advantages of the newer server. IMHO we also > haven't really exploited the facilities provided by > Russel. Moreover, the demo web-site by amitabh has to > be uploaded immediately before we can test it. > So, the forthcoming meet on sunday will be the best > place to converge on a decision. Luggers also please > try their best to attend this meet. However, those who > unable to attend, please also express their views and > opinions beforehand so that the decision is unanimous > rather than that of the attending members only. > I agree with archan about forming a committe for DNS > and Server administration? If we do make it i propose > sayamindu to be one of the members. Of course this is > subject to his permission. > And this could be another agenda for the meet. > > Lets hope for the best and attend the meet of course. > > cheers > siddhartha > > > > --- saugata ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > I think its QUITE OBVIOUS that both should > not exist > > and everubody will unanimously agree on that. But we > > may define some test cases before > > coming to the conclusion that the PDSIT server is > > reliable. We can make this as an agenda of our next > > or > > some coming meeting and the meetimg chair person > > would > > declare the final decission. > > -Saugata > > --- Archan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Now PDSIT server is under test run. I think, once > > it > > > is done, there is > > > no need to keep www1.ilug-cal.org and > > > www.ilug-cal.org both. Members > > > will decide whether to change www.ilug-cal.org DNS > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
