do you think the common users of linux , the not so technically oriented
care or even know what the internal architecture of Linux is NOW ?
They couldn't bother less as long as they have their favorite apps
running !!!!!

And what is the poiont of developing a Microkernel based 'Linux' ? It
should be a totally separate OS, separate identity than Linux.

regards
shourya

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sourangshu Bhattacharya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ilug-cal] Microkernel?
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Well we can have Linux going the normal way.
> The microkernel based one can be called "Micnux" or some such thing.
> 
> People will then choose the more useful one from the two.
> 
> What do you say ?
> 
> Sourangshu
> 
> 
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Sarcar, Shourya C (MED) wrote:
> 
> >  I cannot foresee a microkernel based Linux offshoot (which 
> wouldn't be
> > Linux) which with a driver interface compatible to that of Linux.SO
> > there will be a incompatibility at a driver level. Now at a 
> POSIX API
> > level it might be possible to preserve compatibility. The 
> problem with
> > proprietary as well as open source Unices is that while most try to
> > compatible with the POSIX API , it is the internal difference which
> > surface quite often, most often because the POSIX layer is just an
> > interface specification.
> > 
> > I guess what is very important is the perception people 
> have. Once Linux
> > breaks up, I think it will be easier for Microsoft and 
> others to sell
> > the idea that Linux is headed the ol' Unix way. As it is, 
> Linux distros
> > are making it difficult to build "portable" Linux based 
> systems. While I
> > do not think that a fork  in the kernel will make that any easier or
> > difficult, the perception of an undivided Linux will surely change.
> > 
> > Especially to keep the corporate support flowing, it is necessary to
> > provide a united picture. It can be very hard for the 
> average IT manager
> > to make a choice between user-thread and kernel threaded 
> kernels for his
> > ERP application :-). 
> > 
> > Regards
> > Shourya
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Russell McOrmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:55 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ilug-cal] Microkernel?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Sarcar, Shourya C (MED) wrote:
> > > 
> > > > list goes on). Now, originally this was one of the main 
> > > reasons behind
> > > > Unix failing to become a corporate and commercial standard for
> > > > development , that's were DOS/Windows came in with their "world
> > > > domination".
> > > 
> > >   Different versions of history I suspect.  When you have the 
> > > source, and
> > > have compatability (possibly at both the API/source and 
> > > binary levels) as
> > > a goal, you don't have a problem.  There is nothing in common with
> > > "Proprietary Unix" and "Open Source Unix" as far as this critical
> > > questions are concerned.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> > "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> > FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
> > 
> 
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Sourangshu Bhattacharya
> M.Tech. Computer Science,
> Indian Statistical Institute,
> Kolkata.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html

Reply via email to