in view of the apparent opposition .. paras [a] to [d] below .. i withdraw the compliments
..pk <snipped> > > ..pk > > > > (indra should be thanked for his nice comments of sharing the > > work load .. more sharing will certainly help him and also get > > the work done by spreading the load) > > Not necessary really! Something that I heard Sumeet repeating to ppl on Saturday > "You do it if you want to! But you are not obliged to do it!", really puts the > point across. > > [a] I don't consider what I do w.r.t the LUG as a "workload"... workload is > something that I have to take care of to make my living! > > [b] I do it bcoz I want to. So did/does plenty of other people.... in fact > everyone who contributes to the LUG in one way or another. > > [c] All that is really needed is to stand up and start doing it, rather than > expecting others to do with. Reminds me of the typical attitude of people -- > "Its the govt's job to do it! Why isn't it doing it???" > > [d] Take the initiative (as several people have done in past), communicate with > others what you want to do and get on with it. Transparent communication is an > *absolute pre-condition* to ensure we are not working at cross-purposes, or > against the LUG charter/agenda. Problems arise when members are not aware of > whats going on. > > --indra. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
