-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Prashant Verma wrote:
> You also say " take up the offer - if that turns out to be the best > step ...". I'm sure you don't believe that having LUG meetings may not > be the right step? <clarification> Those who have followed the LUG-Cal through the turbulent times would recall the occasional demand for a *separate* LUG. Now LUG/GLUG/FSUG are about activities and if persons interested in such activities feel that the current entity is not-up-to-the-mark, they can of course go ahead and form another LUG. No where is the current ListAdmin or LUGCo-ord required to respond. The fun is that this is probably the 10th time I read such demands on the list followed by few mails like ones from Vivek and then of course nothing happens. Which in on-ground terms translates into: [1] people are generally lethargic and love the way LUGCal is going (not anywhere much) or [2] there is no one to step up and get an alternate setup going As with *LUG meets*, Soumyadip has just written what I was planning to write. </clarification> Regards Sankarshan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDL5BQ+g4kmZ76nyERAvjtAJ9pJKEJH0u9aN/qfFRkFMpgD+PIRwCgqHbT VkVV0HKq5FoEN/EhHWiGGao= =HjYz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
