On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Rajeev J Sebastian < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Nishandh, > > It is not my fault that you cannot use Linux. Use what is given to > you, improve it, do whatever. Just stop ranting. Do something > constructive. Linux is not non-techies yet, despite what Ubuntu > marketing has fooled you into believing. Deal with it. Move on. > I don't come to you *ranting* about Derrida. No you dont need to,but pls dont use Deconstruction techniques, saying u recommend to "ban me", and then explaining it as "that was not what i meant" it puts us to problem. for me, "*no such method *". > I might take a course in > that subject (paying teachers to teach me), or I might buy several > books (pay authors to teach me). > We prefer buying from the one with best Corporate social responsibility policy. And try e-books know? That they dont be at loss of heavy printing charges, environmental pollution, and avoidance of loss if the printed is not sold. > I would certainly not ask anything > before trying to find out on my own (such as via Google, or > Wikipedia). I will use the limited resources of the people who make > all this content available, in the most efficient manner possible. > Which you belive is the most efficient manner possible, but I think not. The paper promisory note -or currency- has draw backs. Has no immediate source infromation. There are easy and destructive ways to make. http://www.countercurrents.org/curl030510.htm is an alternative, simply came out in TimeBanking discussion group (not to be adopted here, it has lots of problems, its just some history which worked out under conditions. But think of getting to live, when a foreign monopoly from adeveloped nation is imposing its international rates, without considering national economics of developing/undeveloped nations. What if a company achieves monopoly with the aid of patents it filed, and raising the product cost to extremes after it has become a norm?) > Linux was not created by people who send rant emails Who said before? > - it was created > by a bunch of people who took what was available, used it despite all > its shortcomings, and sometimes tried to make it better. > > You have stated that you are not willing to help yourself, Yeah, not willing to learning code. its a disability too.I can make six posters for Linux by the time i visualise an algorithm with operator overriding, overloading and things like pointers in C. My brothers do algorithm for me . > nor are you > willing to get help from manuals/blogs/source code, nor are you > willing to pay someone else to do it for you. I do pay. I have paid.(i have a genuine Windows vista buisiness edition, and a win 7 ordered and paid,to be obtained in a week) and I pay for Linux too, just that it is not in cash. I like the other way more. Looking for affordable arrangements with FOSS video masters (Ready for cash transact, if an MOU is achieved). > Instead, you want a > forum to post angry, ungrammatical (i.e., difficult to read) emails > about linux not working for non-techies. You hope for free support but > then you diss all the people who actually made this stuff for you to > use. I dint DISS ALL THE PEOPLE. Where did I? ur attempt to turn programmers against me?they read everything, not just ur posts. waste time on it. people get dissed when there is logic in what is said againist them and when they feel they are responsible for it. We never put unknown strange men in bad clothes we meet on streets at gun point, when they continuously say F*** words, and utter real illogically.We try to avoid them. Untill we feel ther is some logic in wat he says, which others could understand in a wrong way. Untill they are real problem according to our beliefs. You say the developers who make this stuff are idiots and aren't > obviosly thinking about the user. I feel userfriendliness is not addressed the way it should be. U already supported this view, saying linux is not upto non-techies. HOW DO I MEAN THAT ALL PROGRAMMERS ARE IDIOTS? > Are you sure you're worth responding > to? > dont respond to me. i appreciate responses to the opinions i raise. THEY ARE SHARED! > > Your language has definitely improved; danks! > I hope your explorations will > go deeper than just superficial comments about the state of Linux. > I would listen to as far as i can, but deal with userfriendliness issues, and publicity. You understand it as superficial, I understand it as "could be superficial but SIGNIFICANT" and Its not just Linux,its everything in FOSS. > > Regards > Rajeev J Sebastian > > -- > "Freedom is the only law". > "Freedom Unplugged" > http://www.ilug-tvm.org > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ilug-tvm" group. > To control your subscription visit > http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > > > > For details visit the google group page: > http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en > -- #//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////# "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" Leonardo da Vinci #//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////# -- "Freedom is the only law". "Freedom Unplugged" http://www.ilug-tvm.org You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ilug-tvm" group. To control your subscription visit http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For details visit the google group page: http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en
