On 10/18/05, Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 Oct 2005 1:57 pm, Abhay wrote:
> > Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> > > May I ask what you did with the letters you typed using Shusha?
> > >
> > > - Was your aim only to get something visible in Hindi so that you can
> > > print it?
> >
> > Yes that was/is exactly my motive while using Shusha i.e. to get printed
> > documents.
>
> So there you go, you and Gora/Vivek have been talking about entirely different
> things. You wanted to use the computer as a type writer, while they are
> concerned about communicating with others electronically. In the latter case,
> using standards is very important, but in your case, it doesnt matter what
> method you take, and shusha might work for you.
>
> - Sandip
Actually not. The thread started as a requirement for a keyboard for
entering hindi in linux. I have no problems about someone using susha
or any non-standard font (for that case) ,  but for any new hindi user
to use unicode makes more sense for it's ubiquity and support in
platforms atleast for hindi. Why mix different(proprietary) solution
and depend on ancient rendering schemes when one could use and move
towards a some standardized solution is my question.
cheers
vivek

_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

  • ... Abhay
  • ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    • ... Sandip Bhattacharya
      • ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        • ... Gora Mohanty
          • ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            • ... Nishant Sharma
            • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
              • ... Nitin Chandra
      • ... Gora Mohanty
  • ... विवेक ऐय ्यर விவெக ஐய்யர் Vivek Iyyer
  • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
    • ... Abhay
      • ... vivek khurana
      • ... Kenneth Gonsalves
        • ... Abhay
          • ... Kenneth Gonsalves

Reply via email to