The setup is almost like you described, except the socks servers are all
running on my machine on different ports and each server maps to a tunnel
which is connected to the hosts A, B and C. LVS looks like a complicated
solution. Is all that necessary in case all the socks servers are running on
the same machine, just on different ports? and, isnt it possible to map an
ssh tunnel to a network interface? that way we could use the kernel's
default load balancing functionality.

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Mayank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If I've understood your problem correctly then you have a machine which
> can
> access internet using SOCKS servers running on multiple machines.
>
>                         -------------->Socks Server on Machine A --------
>
> |                                                                |
> Your Machine --->------------->Socks Server on Machine B
> ----------------->
> Router/Firewall ------> Internet
>
> |                                                                |
>                         -------------->Socks Server on Machine C---------
>
> I guess above diagram illustrates the situation of your setup. In this
> case
> you can use a dispatcher system before socks servers and allow the
> dispatcher system to do load balancing for your connection. I've not done
> it
> myself but for the sake of it you can give LVS (
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org) a try. Please do revert back if it
> helps
> you out.
>
> Regards,
> Mayank
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Navjot Kukreja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I access the internet by establishing an SSH tunnel to one of multiple
> > hosts, and using dynamic port forwarding(SOCKS) on my computer. I would
> > like
> > to do some load sharing over the multiple tunnels that I have,
> effectively
> > increasing the speed that i get. Is there a way that I can configure an
> > SSH
> > tunnel as a network interface on the machine? Also, is there another way
> > to
> > carry out load sharing over multiple tunnels without creating
> interfaces?
> > Thank you
> > Navjot Kukreja
> > _______________________________________________
> > ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
> > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> > Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
> > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Reality is the ultimate fantasy ...
> _______________________________________________
> ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>



-- 
/\/ /\ \/ _| () ^|^
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to