-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ,--[ On Tuesday 22 Apr 2008, Navjot Kukreja wrote: | The setup is almost like you described, except the socks servers are all | running on my machine on different ports and each server maps to a tunnel | which is connected to the hosts A, B and C. LVS looks like a complicated | solution. Is all that necessary in case all the socks servers are running | on the same machine, just on different ports? and, isnt it possible to map | an ssh tunnel to a network interface? that way we could use the kernel's | default load balancing functionality. |
Okay I don't know how you're going to leverage kernels built-in load balancing functionality, but okay you can bind OpenSSH tunnel's SOCKS proxy to a network address, using -D option of ssh(1). So, are you going to use multipath routing + layered interfaces, hmm...? # ip route add nexthop via [addr1] nexthop via [addr2] nexthop via [addr3] HTH - -- Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ ·-- ·- ···· ·--- ·- ···- ·- ·--·-· --· -- ·- ·· ·-·· ·-·-·- -·-· --- -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIDyf8Hy+EEHYuXnQRAgCtAKDXtfwqjM8va2KAsAzoprsdE9EUIACg1V6v EMcxMi8zUA8VIbwIUYhT6l0= =MOKP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
