On Monday 06 Aug 2012 20:16:04 Curtis Rueden wrote: > Personally I think people should need to explicitly subscribe to receive > unstable/SNAPSHOT updates.
I agree. But at the moment is it unclear what the "update" achieves. There is little chance of being able to test any fixes if we cannot download these. I suppose that I could go the maven way and build some version, but still not sure what In this page: http://developer.imagej.net/development is this the latest/unstable?: git clone git://github.com/imagej/imagej.git > Until we get the multiple channel updates working though, we are erring on > the side of caution with the update site, meaning you must explicitly > download the latest snapshot build ZIP file if you want to try it before > each beta release. Sure, but look at the dates of the files... 2.0.0-beta3 has a release date of July 13, The zip with the "latest" snapshot has a date (the newest in the /jars folder) of 12 of *June*, older than the beta3... Cheers Gabriel _______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
