Hi Gabriel, I have been out on vacation recently but have now seen you mention that you mailed me a plugin that shows an error. I did get that email but have not gotten around to it yet. I'll try to dig into this soon. Sorry for the wait.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Gabriel Landini <[email protected]>wrote: > On Monday 06 Aug 2012 20:16:04 Curtis Rueden wrote: > > > Personally I think people should need to explicitly subscribe to receive > > unstable/SNAPSHOT updates. > > I agree. But at the moment is it unclear what the "update" achieves. > There is little chance of being able to test any fixes if we cannot > download > these. I suppose that I could go the maven way and build some version, but > still not sure what > > In this page: > http://developer.imagej.net/development > > is this the latest/unstable?: > git clone git://github.com/imagej/imagej.git > > > Until we get the multiple channel updates working though, we are erring > on > > the side of caution with the update site, meaning you must explicitly > > download the latest snapshot build ZIP file if you want to try it before > > each beta release. > > Sure, but look at the dates of the files... > > 2.0.0-beta3 has a release date of July 13, > The zip with the "latest" snapshot has a date (the newest in the /jars > folder) > of 12 of *June*, older than the beta3... > > Cheers > > Gabriel > > > _______________________________________________ > ImageJ-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel >
_______________________________________________ ImageJ-devel mailing list [email protected] http://imagej.net/mailman/listinfo/imagej-devel
