I am not sure I just know that it has increased security. I wish there were
a webpage showing the specs on Microsoft and Bind DNS. Like performance
between the two and how much memory they take. But you should get the url of
the 8.8.2 release.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David V. Brenner
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Off Topic DNS suggestions
> Can anyone give me some examples of what kind of servers
> they have? Like
> how many people are using BIND 8.8.2 or Microsoft DNS and also if
> they would
> suggest having the DNS on a completely different computer.
I am using 4.9.7 on NT4 SP6a for both primary and secondary. Both boxes are
Pentium II 350s with 384 megs of PC100 ECC SDRAM and have other
responsibilities besides DNS. With informational event logging turned off,
the primary can get quite busy with requests yet there is never any
noticeable drag on the machine or any of its other services.
I am glad to hear that there is a non-MetaInfo version 8 contribution
available now. I would like to give it a try. Version 8 uses a different
zone and config file format, doesn't it?
_______________________________________
David V. Brenner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
International Services Network Corporation
http://www.cport.com
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
