Re: [IMail Forum] SA offer from Kevin

[Darin Cox]

For my part, if everything can be stabilized by March 1 for the major features (working webmail with no loss of functionality, and stable mail delivery), then I would be happy.   That may be an aggressive timeframe at less than 6 weeks away, but there does seem to be good progress so far towards resolving many of the issues.  Just not sure how much can be fixed/added back into webmail in that timeframe. Darin.     ----- Original Message ----- From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 1:55 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] SA offer from Kevin As far as running 2006 "early" I have to respond with the fact that software should function as sold and we shouldn't have to be a complete release behind. In some cases we can't be due to security issues. Since Imail was supposed to be untouched in terms of pop and smtp we were less concerned about it causing us problems. Everything outside of web messaging functions well enough except for smtpd running up to a now record high of 750 MB's of ram. Not a problem since we have plenty in the server but still a cause for concern. At the time, I felt it was a fair offer from Kevin to add the additional 3 months onto the SA if we were to purchase it in advance. We've has so many complaints about web messaging speed that it's ridiculous. I really think those of us that bought SA's should receive another extension up to whatever release actually fixes all the problems with 2006.