Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

[Darin Cox]

We haven't installed it yet, waiting for everything to settle down, but I have an idea as to a possible cause regarding the slowness: .NET's Viewstate could be the culprit.  I've run into this before, as it causes the browser to have to send a ton of info back to the server, which is usually at much slower upload rates than the download rates.  Turning off the Viewstate where it is not needed (.NET always turns it on by default) has resulted in a huge difference for us in the past.   The good thing is this can all be controlled by the ASPX files, so since no code-behind source code is needed we can test this on our own.  Anyone have it installed that is comfortable enough with .NET to turn Viewstate off where it isn't needed in the ASPX files?  Admittedly this would be best done by Ipswitch, but someone familiar enough with .NET should be able to take a stab at it as well. Darin.     ----- Original Message ----- From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically a Lexus with a Yugo engine. Looks good but slow as molasses. Bill Brian Hruska wrote: So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release?  Does it work well enough to upgrade to yet? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/