Re: [IMail Forum] outbound rules gone from 2006?

[Matrosity Hosting]

I would agree but I've seen .03 working and it looks good. If course the proof is in the pudding. Jim F. wrote: Honestly? At this point, this is a novelty item as far as I'm concerned.  I'd like to see Ipswitch deliver a solid, stable, well-performing product with the EXISTING feature set before trying to add more complexity (and therefore more suckitude) into it.   -JF From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:33 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] outbound rules gone from 2006? everyone please chime in here because I'm sure this is an issue for all of us and ipswitch needs to know this is a problem, Michael Thomas - Mathbox wrote: Hi All, having outbound rules on virtuals clears this up easily. I have been watching this thread and biting my tongue through the whole thing. I just do not understand why IMail is IP domain centric with filtering. There is no particular reason that I can think of, except Ipswitch motivation, that IMail could not have layered SPAM filtering, inbound and outbound rules, and Blacklist rejection. Everything that happens at the IP domain level could also happen at the virtual domain level, depending on the virtual domains needs and/or desires, while server enforcment happened at the IP level. In case someone wonders, I have used IMail since V4.0x when it delivered on diskettes. Yes, I am licensed for the version 2006. I have not upgraded. I am running 8.22. Michael Thomas Mathbox To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/