|
hi
joe,
let me
check some more into the first item about seeing every file in the spool.
sometimes the spool can get quite large and may take some time to load.
would you want to sort or filter? would other folks find this
information valuable - list of every file, size, date created,
sender/receiver?
for
the second, "Add to Address Book" , we'll be
looking at that one - sounds like it comes up several times and is one of the
remaining parity items. definitely is a time saver!
bye
for now,
kg
I would like to see every file in the spool, how long it
has been there, the size, who it's from and who it's to. Now we just
have a summary... worthless.
Another example on the web messaging: You're
viewing a file in web messaging. In older versions you could click one
button to add the sender to your address book. With 2006.03 you can't
even tell who the message is from! Not listed unless you show headers,
and then users are lost. If they're good enough to figure out who the
message actually came from then they have to cut and paste to put into their
address book.
You should show the from email address as a default, and
have an "Add to Address Book" button. Shouldn't this be basic
stuff?
-Joe
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:44
AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is
it safe?
hi
joe,
lots of good points!
we
are in the process of adding licensing status to the interfaces (e.g. "Trial
with 10 days remaining" or "Activated on xx date"). we also plan to
stuff the Serial Number in a new About box coming later this
year.
yes, there are some parity issues in the web messaging and we are in
the process of addressing several of these (like the disk space indicator,
link to web calendar, login page options like "remember
me").
regarding the health of the server, what type of information would
you like to see?
"it's nearly impossible to figure out
what's actually going on with the server at any given
time."
bye for now,
kg
Overall 2006.03 has been stable, but there are still
many features missing in the webmail system. The admin interface is
not as good as the old one, and it's nearly impossible to figure out
what's actually going on with the server at any given time.
As for the activations... this has been a pain in my
side from the beginning. I've had to call, email, and beg for more
activations. Each patch, or repair install requires a new activation
on my server. I have never been successful in activating via the
built in interface... I have to use the web based offline
activation. I suppose they must use a port that I have blocked, but
I don't know for sure. There's no easy way to tell if your install
is activated or not. All in all, I'd say the activation process was
reason enough not to use Imail, but maybe others may have better
experiences. So far I bet I've been forced to activate at least 12
times... all manually, and all but ther first two I had to beg Ipswitch to
give me more.
-Joe
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:42
AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03
is it safe?
Bruce,
If you contact our Customer Service group
they can make more activations available. By default we allow you 2 but
in most cases we can extend that.
Eric S
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 6:31
PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
2006.03 is it safe?
Kevin,
I am in the process of moving my current
installation of IMail from our current server to a new mail server,
porting the accounts and data and then doing an update from 8.22 to
2006.4
Unfortunately, my current serial number,
001001 712945 631696 723802 499805, does not allow me to do another
installation to the new server.
Can this be adjusted to allow another
installation to the new server so I can make it live and then do the
upgrade to 2006?
Our current service agreement is:
Thanks in advance for your
assistance
Bruce Barnes
ChicagoNetTech Inc
3401 W Beach Ave
Chicago IL
60651-2332
Office: 773.491.9019
hi all,
as with previous releases, we'll be demoing the upcoming IMail
2006.05 release in a few weeks - demoing all the new features
completed in the last month and taking feedback on how to
improve/refine the new features.
bye for now,
kg
More likely .05.
Tripp
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006
1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum]
2006.03 is it safe?
.04?
Tripp Allen wrote:
We are working to add that feature in a future
release.
Tripp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bonno Bloksma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:46 PM
Subject: Re:
[IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?
Hi,
[....]
Oh yes, another
feature "lost" in this upgrade is the graphic
display of
disk usage/available for the client. Gone. Users do not know
when
they are near capacity any longer, with the exception
of using the Full
Mailbox Notification. The disk usage
graphic was a very useful tool that
just disappeared.
Oop, that's a feature we would realy WANT to have
back. We have a lot of students that have mailboxes near the
limit. They "constanly" need to know when they are too close
to th elimit.
Kevin, is it on the list already to be
re-added?
Groetjes,
Bonno Bloksma
---
[E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by
Declude Virus]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
|
