> I will probably be dumping IMail if I can't get this resolved,
> even though I think it's a good mail server in most other respects.
Switching mail *servers* because of a problem reported on the *client* end is silly,
unless you know that the problem lies on the server side. Otherwise, you're wasting
resources (time, money, etc.).
If I recall correctly, this has been brought up here before, and is a problem with
some Microsoft beta product?
In any case, if Microsoft acknowledges that this is a problem, and says that it works
as expected in one of their products and not another, it sounds an awful lot like a
client problem. If it *is* a server problem, it must be a common server problem --
how else could they be so sure that an error on the server end would work fine with
their low end product (Outlook Express), but not their higher end product (Outlook)?
-Scott
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
- RE: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts and peering Ali Port
- RE: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts and peeri... Len Conrad
- RE: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts and ... Ali Port
- Re: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts ... Quentin Baker
- Re: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts ... �ӻ���
- RE: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts ... Ali Port
- RE: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts ... Len Conrad
- Re: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts ... Quentin Baker
- Re: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts and peeri... Quentin Baker
- [IMail Forum] LDAP screwed up? Ali Port
- Re: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem scott.perry
- Re: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem scott.perry
- RE: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem Michael Gartner
- RE: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem scott.perry
- RE: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem Michael Gartner
- RE: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem scott.perry
- RE: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem Michael Gartner
- RE: [IMail Forum] Message.txt - still a problem scott.perry
