>The downside of this approach is that it requires Microsoft SMTP to be
>running. Of course MS SMTP is configured to restrict access, but I think it
>would be better if MS SMTP was not needed at all. Better to use iMail with
>its built in security.
MS SMTP service running, necessarily, on a non-standard port for SMPT
service would be pretty a obscure spam target, but there isn't away
in MS SMTP to restrict relay? I hear in W2K SMTP there is a
relay-for-addresses.
Since you've already got it running, I suggest sticking with it. It's
a very common approach.
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8.2.2 p5 installable binary for NT4
http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
