>Obviously his Imail machine is having some problem. Was it
>up/running/tested before you put the IMGate in front of it?
Actually, he hired me to put in imgate quickly because he thought his
machine had been overloaded and was very slow recently and that
imgate would offload some work, but I found anomalies in trying to
telnet to his machine which I think are still biting shim now. The
weird thing is the message IMGate now has, saying the Imail queue is
overflowed. IMGate is still moving msgs at a 50K msgs/day rate, but
look at his IMGate stats for today so far:
Grand Totals
------------
messages
23175 received
27423 delivered
135 forwarded
4109 deferred (18563 deferrals)
2117 bounced
4108 rejected
381616k bytes received
423791k bytes delivered
9895 senders
3208 sending hosts/domains
7002 recipients
1648 recipient hosts/domains
Per-Hour Traffic Summary
time received delivered deferred bounced rejected
--------------------------------------------------------------------
0000-0100 1305 2161 937 163 246
0100-0200 1284 2449 804 308 208
0200-0300 951 2083 316 222 158
0300-0400 898 1676 268 168 191
0400-0500 963 1100 149 106 300
0500-0600 1032 1176 267 92 297
0600-0700 964 1116 259 101 209
0700-0800 1251 1476 154 100 275
0800-0900 1306 1440 299 99 278
0900-1000 1968 1835 221 67 256
1000-1100 2417 2013 653 109 308
1100-1200 2180 1978 1822 129 225
1200-1300 2170 2215 2626 147 307
1300-1400 1974 2196 2632 137 206
1400-1500 2008 2052 2286 140 207
1500-1600 355 319 2637 22 266
1600-1700 149 138 2233 7 171
1700-1800 0 0 0 0 0
you can see the huge drop in throughput at 1500-1600 hours. and that
was preceded by the huge jump in deferrals (queued msgs) at 1100-1200 hours.
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8.2.2 p5 & 8.2.3 T6B for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
