The most likely cause of this issue is that the Server is looking to itself
for DNS lookup meaning that the server with the ip of 207.199.130.165 has
entries in it's tcp/ip setting that point to itself for DNS. This should
not be. It is almost like asking yourself for directions.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Spoke too fast.
> Could someone send me a copy of a dns record for a zone. I have to
figure
> out why this error still occurs here. I've said before that we have run
for
> over two years without the first DNS errors. Zones are set up the same
way
> they were always set up and still I am geting this error and more
frequently
> than ever... (IS there any printed material on just this error
anywhere?)
>
> Items 1, 2, 3, do not apply to this server or are not being used.
>
> <<<<<<DNS Server encountered a packet addressed to itself -- IP address
> 207.199.130.165. The DNS server should never be sending a packet to
itself.
> This situation usually indicates a configuration error. Check the
following
> areas for possible self-send configuration errors: 1) Forwarders
list.
> (DNS servers should not forward to themselves). 2) Master lists of
> secondary zones. 3) Notify lists of primary zones. 4) Delegations
of
> subzones. Must not contain NS record for DNS server Example: ->
> This DNS server dns1.foo.com is the primary for the zone foo.com. ->
You
> have delegated the zone bar.foo.com to bardns.bar.foo.com. and are
> NOT running the bar.foo.com zone on this DNS (dns1.foo.com). ->
> bar.foo.com MUST NOT have an NS record that points at dns1.foo.com.
> Note, you should make this check (with nslookup or DNS manager) both on
> this DNS server and on the server(s) you delegated the subzone to. It
is
> possible that the delegation was done correctly, but that the primary
> DNS for the subzone, has any incorrect NS record pointing back at this
> server. If this incorrect NS record is cached at this server, then the
> self-send could result. If found, the subzone DNS server admin should
> remove the offending NS record. >>>>>>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 4:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Spoke too fast.
>
>
> >
> > >Wait a second.....
> > >Hi everyone!
> > >Meet Dumb and Dumber
> >
> > Isn't self-knowledge a wonderful gift! vbg
> >
> > Len
> >
> >
> > http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8.2.2 p5 & 8.2.3 T6B for NT4 & W2K
> > http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
> >
> > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> > to be removed from this list.
> >
> > An Archive of this list is available at:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
