> But if Imail adds it's own header, couldn't it add a header that
> Outlook Express claims is 'out-of-standard'?
Yes, they certainly could claim that. However, while there has been quite a bit of
talk about "malformed headers", I haven't seen IMail produce one yet. If they claim
it is "out-of-standard", let's see the header... I'll even take the time to check with
the RFCs to see if it is acceptable or not. Without a malformed header to look at,
there's not much that can be done.
Several people have said that Microsoft says that the headers are malformed, but I
have yet to see any malformed headers. We need proof before we can say Microsoft is
right.
The headers that IMail here added to your E-mail were:
Received: from list.ipswitch.com [156.21.1.21] by declude.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.04) id A9A43580EAA; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 02:54:28 -0400
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-UIDL: 473362642
Status: U
(they may not be formatted exactly due to web messaging and margins)
There is nothing wrong with those headers.
--
-Scott
Declude: Anti-virus and Anti-spam solutions for IMail. http://www.declude.com
--
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
