> Just to update everyone, they had said that the domain wcmail.net did
> not reverse...
You should check to see what they really mean (or said). A domain can't have "a
reverse". A host name can have IP address(es) associated with it, and an IP address
can have a reverse.
> and the To: header was blank. That was why the email had been
> filtered out.
That would be a logical spam check. Why are you sending out E-mail with no To:
header? It's kind of like addressing an envelope "To whom it may concern". That
works when on a letter addressed to a company, but it just doesn't cut it as an
address.
> In discussion with this group, they should not require a reverse
They could, but would lose tons of E-mail that way. It could be part of their
now-famous "point system".
> and the RCPT TO: is where they should be looking for the aol.com
> addresses the messages are being sent to. Is this correct?
Yes, But. The RCPT TO: has to have an AOL address in it, unless either you are using
an AOL mail server to relay (a REALLY dumb thing to do), or someone's DNS records are
mixed up and pointing to AOL. So you really shouldn't worry about. If they are
checking a "To:" address to make sure it exists (and says aol.com), it would HAVE to
be in the message headers.
--
-Scott
Declude: Anti-virus and Anti-spam solutions for IMail. http://www.declude.com
--
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
