We use Linux running Bind and Admin using Webmin. Both are Pro200 with 128mb
ram and 4gb drives

I cannot remember the last time I rebooted the boxes or had a problem with
DNS other than the idiot between the seat and keyboard mis-typing things

We did run MS-DNS on W2K and if the box is a PDC and if you do not use
MS-DNS as a root server for the AD tree then the DNS Event log fills with
errors on dynamic directory updates because it's not a root for the tree.
Real pain in the !@#@#

Bill James

"You're just jealous because the
little voices are talking to me"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evans Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 9:59 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT : Windows 2000 DNS or BIND DNS??


> We use Bind on FreeBSD here.  We administor it via a web based interface
> called WebMin.  The combination has worked flawlessly for us and is easily
> maintained.  If I need to add many domains at once, I abandon the web
> interface and SSH into my server to modify the files directly.  I can't
> recommend it highly enough.
>
> -Evans
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 5:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [IMail Forum] OT : Windows 2000 DNS or BIND DNS??
>
>
> hi,
>
> Not trying to start a war.
>
> I sincerely need opinions and feedback
> on which DNS server to run.
>
> the free one being at
> http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com at Len's site.
>
> I don't have complicated W2000 stuff to
> run.
>
> I'm concerned mainly about:
>
> - since I don't want to have to reload the
> entire DNS server each time I add a zone, the
> ability to tell the
> DNS server to update only for ONE zone
> at a time is important.
>
> - easy integration (easy to add zones from
> any programming interface); I don't want to
> use some clunky GUI tool to add a few hundred. :)
> - secure (no serious known security holes)
> - stable
> - reasonable performance
> - scalable (will not hit 100K domains, but I just like
> the idea of telling the boss it can hit
> 50-100K domains or more) :)
> - Windows 2000 Server cost is not an issue.
> - easy to setup Secondary Domains to replicate
> from the primary
>
>
> I'll appreciate any opinions and feedback that you
> have.
>
> thanks,
> John
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to