Oh darn, I'm so sorry for my vicious retort.  I'd forgotten how badly 
words can hurt.  If you thought that was a flame you obviously haven't 
been around very long.

Of course everyone will make a decision based on what they feel is best 
for them.  The original post didn't try to tell anyone what to do, it 
just pointed to some information.  Since it's a good bet that virtually 
everyone on this list is running IIS I feel that it was relevant and 
that the reply was unnecessary.  If the post had said "everyone must 
drop IIS immediately" then the reply would have been appropriate.

Dan

Sanford Whiteman wrote:

> Dan,
> 
> Why  did  you feel it necessary to flame? It's quite clear from Mike's
> response that he meant that we don't have to take the advice of shills
> like   those   from   the   Gartner   Group   who   profit   from  the
> multi-thousand-dollar  prices  they  affix to their "full reports." GG
> has  a  clear  motivation  to  suggest  wide-ranging changes in OS and
> applications  in  order  to  make their reports look like "must-have,"
> "sexy"  analysis,  instead of the negligible fluff they usually are (I
> have  worked  for  a  few  companies  who purchased such full reports,
> knowing  they were mentioned, and let me assure you that the practical
> worth  of  the  report, as compared with a free trade magazine review,
> was $0).
> 
> Instead,   Mike  suggests,  we  will  decide  based  on  our  PERSONAL
> experiences  and  the  other  PERSONAL experiences of list members, as
> well  as independent trades, when making purchasing decisions. I agree
> with him wholeheartedly.
> 
> On  the other hand, I would NOT hesitate to blame Microsoft in another
> way: for treating HTML mail as a value-added communications mechanism,
> rather than as the giant security risk it really is, since this is how
> Nimda  gets  started. Security-conscious MUAs don't let this happen; I
> use  The  Bat!,  which  doesn't  support "active content" or any other
> bandwidth-destroying,  time-wasting  stuff, and I can be quite sure my
> workstation won't be an unwilling participant in something like this.
> 
> Sandy
> 
> 
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
> to be removed from this list.
> 
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> 


-- 

Dan Shadix
Computer Network Manager
Terry Reilly Health Services


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to