Kelly,

Your intuition has already told you to either (a) get huge mail blasts
off  a  server  that's under load as quickly as possible, or (b) never
send  them  through your mailbox server at all. Your best-fit solution
depends  on the priorities you give to OS standardization and support,
raw throughput, and single-server integration.

No  matter  what,  you're going to want another box besides your Imail
server  to  help  you  out.  There  are huge performance advantages to
offloading  remote SMTP sending and DNS resolution to a dedicated box,
called  a  Smart  Host.  The  advantages  apply  to  all  mail servers
regardless of platform, but do apply particularly to Imail in light of
its  process-centric  (rather  than  thread-centric)  architecture,  a
development choice that really makes its handicaps known when you dump
a  lot  of  bulk  mail...HOWEVER,  these process-related handicaps are
negligible  when  you  use  Scott  Perry's  great Declude products for
Imail,   www.declude.com,  which  include  a  new  queue  manager,  in
conjunction with a Smart Host.

So  on to your choices. For each, figure on a dual-processor PIII Xeon
at 400 Mhz+ with at least 256 MB RAM and a RAID 1 array with 64 MB+ of
controller  cache. You don't need all the RAM for the *nix options due
to  the  low  OS  overhead, but for the negligible price these days it
couldn't  hurt  to standardize the hardware (if you're a Windows shop,
RAM is probably already a given).

1) IMAILSRV/MSSMTP: If you're standardized on Windows architecture and
want  to  keep  all of your list administration tasks within the Imail
GUIs  (web and Windows), and you're comfortable with the functionality
of  Imail's  built-in list server, IMAILSRV, put up your second box on
Windows  2000  (Pro  is OK) with IIS 5's SMTP server. Microsoft's SMTP
Server  for  IIS  5  is  actually  enterprise-capable,  multithreaded,
SMP-aware,  etc.  I  find  it  underrated,  since  it's  free, runs on
cheapish  2K  Pro  and serves the Smart Host purpose excellently. Also
make  sure  you're  running  Declude  to  take  advantage of its queue
management.

2)  IMAILSRV/POSTFIX: If, again, you're cool with IMAILSRV as your MLM
but  want the fastest possible performance from your Smart Host-driven
architecture  and  are  comfortable  supporting  a *nix OS, put up the
second box on Linux or BSD and install PostFix. PostFix is faster than
Microsoft  SMTP  and  can  do  more  with  less  hardware,  like  most
*nix-based products. Len Conrad has prepared an installation guide for
PostFix/Imail  integration  he calls IMGate (http://IMGate.MEIway.com)
that  would  help you here. Here too, make sure you're running Declude
with Imail.

3)   LISTAR/POSTFIX:   If   you   don't   need  a  single-OS,  nor  an
Imail-integrated   solution,   and  are  disappointed  with  the  list
management capabilities of IMAILSRV, you can put up your second box on
*nix,  install  PostFix, and install a *nix-based mailing list manager
(MLM) such as Listar (www.listar.org, soon to be renamed Ecartis) that
sends  though  the  local  PostFix  MTA.  In  this  config,  Listar is
maintained  completely separately from Imail, but gives you a lot more
functionality  than  IMAILSRV.  You  could  also  use the same PostFix
installation  as  Imail's  Smart  Host for user mail, or segregate the
systems entirely.

Write back if you need more elaboration. I do note that you've started
a  new  thread  in  the meantime which seems to suggest an outsourcing
move,  so I don't know if this post is relevant anymore...but there it
is!

Regards,

Sandy

P.S. I would be remiss if I didn't mention a fourth solution that's on
the  horizon.  My  firm  (Broadleaf  Systems)  has a team working on a
full-featured   replacement   for   IMAILSRV   that  will  give  Imail
Ecartis-level  functionality  on-board.  Some  of  our  functions, all
absent now from IMAILSRV and some even from Ecartis, include:

- Subscribe/change/unsubscribe confirmation

- HTML, Return Receipt Request, PKI, and oversize rejection/stripping

- Automated bounce message processing

- Handshake-only (simple) and full-text (thorough) membership probes

- ODBC membership lists, synchronizable with ODBC domain userbases

- Multiple moderators

- Backward compatibility with IMAILSRV lists, or optional conversion

Despite its relevance to your situation, the release of our product in
2002  will  no  doubt be too late for your needs. I mention it here so
that you might "pencil us in" and be sure to check back with is if you
have any issues with the solution you do choose.


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to