On 1/1/02, Sanford Whiteman penned: >With regard to Imail, your compliance with the license is linked to >the number of simultaneous incoming SMTP/IMAP4/POP3 connections, which >might be difficult to baseline in smallish environments. My guess is >that even at the 100-user mark, it might go either way depending on >POP3 polling frequency.
Not sure if it is the same thing, but when using W2K Server, it doesn't count as a client access unless the person connection actually logs in using W2K Authentication. I don't believe IMail uses W2K authentication, does it? Particularly note the last sentence in the 2nd paragraph. From: http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/howtobuy/pricing/model.asp Authenticated use by applications. Customers whose applications use Windows 2000 authentication or directory credentials will require CALs. Many such customers have already purchased CALs for other services such as file and print. But for those who do not have CALs for other purposes, CALs will be a new requirement. Authenticated Internet access. Customers with Internet sites using Windows 2000 authentication will require CALs for authenticated users connecting to their sites. Such customers may comply with this licensing requirement by purchasing CALs in "Per seat" or "Per Server" mode. Or, they may opt to purchase the new Internet Connector license for unlimited Internet CALs on a single server. Access to Internet sites by anonymous users does not require a CAL. ******** -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ 954.721.3452 Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
