On 1/1/02, Sanford Whiteman penned: >Bud, > >>Not sure if it is the same thing, but when using W2K Server, it >>doesn't count as a client access unless the person connection >>actually logs in using W2K Authentication. > >This applies to CALs, which are never needed--indeed, they are >meaningless--with Workstation products. So that's not the question >we're working on, which is "What are you legally allowed to do with a >Workstation product over a network?" The answer is in my original >link: basically anything you want, as long as there aren't more than >10 remote computers connecting at one time.
Yes, but whether they CALL the 10 allowed connections by remote computers CALs or not, it's still basically allowing 10 clients access to the Workstation. So I just figured that since M$ doesn't consider a remote computer as using a CAL when accessing the Server version unless they are using W2K Authentication, then perhaps they use the same reasoning when accessing the Workstation version. -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ 954.721.3452 Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
