On 09:08 4/6/2002 -0500, it would appear that Madscientist wrote: >I can tell that what you stripped was a really good flame and I >appreciate your effort. Sorry to spark that, but here's the counterpoint >to your argument: "no legitimate user really needs HTML email"... > >We have many corporate users who now regularly rely on HTML formatted >reports, analysis, and presentations all delivered via HTML email. None >of them would ever consider using an email package that does not support >HTML mail because their internal business systems have become dependent >upon this capability.
Pardon the awful pun but, "That's rich!" The point being this: Is there any of what you describe above that cannot be accomplished via a simple attachment and likely accomplished *better* by attachments? The issue of HTML email raises its ugly <head> once in a while but having heavily educated top management on the problems with HTML email (message bloat, virus infections, spyware, browser inconsistencies al a Netscape/IE) I find it very easy to quash any efforts to standardize on HTML email. Tyran Ormond Programmer/LAN Technician Central Valley Water [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
