Hi Dave,

Just posted another response to another list member about this.

-Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Koontz [mailto:dkoontz@;mbc.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IWEBMSG: 'no action has been taken'


That is even more disturbing, to be forced to run IIS to fix a bug in
iMail???  What if I don't want IIS and it's own security shortcomings on
the mail server?


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:IMail_Forum-owner@;list.ipswitch.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IWEBMSG: 'no action has been taken'


I have seen mention on this forum before of a suggestion to run IIS on
port 80 and set up a .asp page that does a redirect to the off port that
you set for Imail. The thought behind this is IIS is much stronger to
handle code red attacks and such.

If you search the archives, I am sure you will be able to find it, or
someone might post more information about that redirect.

John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to