Yes, I was using .ima files. Thanks for the help R.
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 14:55:36 -0400 > >> > You're not doing anything wrong -- filters catch words, not >> > attachments. There isn't any way that I can think of to block attachments >> > with 100% accuracy using filters. > >>Would a rules.ima be a better choice for stripping attachments? > >I assumed he was using rules.ima? I'm not talking about Declude filters >(for that, Declude Virus will automatically handle blocking of file >extensions). > >The problem is that if you search for "na me=" followed by anything >followed by ".c om", you're 100% guaranteed to catch HTML E-mail that >contains "na me=" followed by anything followed by ".c om". :) > >Using "filena me=" produces less false positives (since much fewer HTML >E-mails have "filena me=" in them), but also would somewhat few attachments. > > -Scott >--- >Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. >Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver >vulnerability detection. >Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. > >--- >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > >To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
