> "Not a good practice" is irrelevant for high-volume mail servers that > develop huge backlogs in just a few minutes.
- The system performance is the mail capacity criteria. Of course to made a final choise the administrator should compare what the program can do and amount of incoming traffic. I am not sure that any developer can provide such functionality to check hundred of mails per minutes. > I was disturbed to read your response (in another message) that > "Probably most [people] choose to receive a harmful messages instead > not send and receive anything at all"; I fear that this shows that > you're out of step with the real world of systems administration, > which quite commonly requires that we make decisions that best protect > the integrity of internal systems and external reputations, rather > than responding to non-technical users who have nary a concept of the > dangers posed by viruses. - As you may suspect any kind of software could not provide 100% garantree of free virus traffic. The main reason is anti-virus provider bases is not up to date. And if you tell everybody that my software provide it you just make me doubt of your high specialist reputation. (sorry this is my opinion) > I submit that you should rewrite your application to use the SendName > hook, then (re)present it to the IMail community. It could thus be > judged on its own merits, none of which are inherent in the use of MBX > file scanning. > > --Sandy Thank you, i think your suggestion over To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
