Most of the additional positives are _probably_ phishing attempts. Clam is fairly aggressive at detecting phishing attempts, but FProt doesn't even try.
Jerry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:32 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam > On 17 Dec 2004 at 11:12, Bill Foresman wrote: > > > my dilemma is that Clam seems to catch more viruses > This is probably a question that Declude Scott can answer but my > first thought is ClamAV may be making false positives? > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
