Most of the additional positives are _probably_ phishing attempts.  Clam
is fairly aggressive at detecting phishing attempts, but FProt doesn't
even try.

... because F-Prot is a virus scanner, not anti-spam.

If that really is why ClamAV appeared to detect more viruses, this would definitely explain the perceived difference. I am unaware of any true viruses that get past F-Prot that ClamAV detects.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.



---- This outgoing message is guaranteed to be authentic by Message Level users. Guarantee the authenticity of your email @ http://www.messagelevel.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to