|
I'm really comparing system overhead here. Clam takes a big chunk out
of the processor when it runs while f-prot barely even registers. Send
out a 10K user newsletter and this becomes a problem. Darin Cox wrote: Uh...apples and oranges... F-prot is not an anti-phishing product. Evidently Clam has that feature. Since F-Prot does not, it shouldn't be compared to Clam in that category.Those "hits" need to be qualified as to exactly what they are. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Murdock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:16 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Not meant as a dig against F-Prot - I love the product. I can accept the narrower scope, but if comparing the raw number of hits clam is going to appear to capture a lot more stuff. Jerry ----- Original Message ----- From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:16 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam |
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam David Gregg
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam David Gregg
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Nick Hayer
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Jerry Murdock
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam R. Scott Perry
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Jerry Murdock
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Darin Cox
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Landry
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Len Conrad
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Len Conrad
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam David Gregg
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Len Conrad
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam David Gregg
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam R. Scott Perry
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Foresman
- Re: [IMail Forum] fprot vs. clam Bill Landry
