Yes, it looks like a firewall is what he wants. ;) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John Tolmachoff (Lists) > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 11:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Need help with configuring anti-spam > > Then you sir do not understand how e-mail works, as by your > statement you do not want to receive any e-mail from the internet. > > Or are you going to try and add every single IP address for > every server for those that you want to send you e-mail? > > John T > eServices For You > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Fornander > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 8:05 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Need help with configuring anti-spam > > > > > > I have RTFM. > > Please read my post. > > It has nothing to with who can send out mail. > > > > I don't want Imail to receive mail to ANY users if that mail is NOT > > sent from a trusted IP or authenticated. > > > > There is no way of doing this AFAIK unless we switch all > users to use > > port 587 and block access to port 25 to Imail from the Internet. > > > > Jonas Fornander - System Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC - > > www.netwood.net Find out why we're better - 310-442-1530 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Dan Horne > > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:50 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Need help with configuring anti-spam > > > > > > "Imail should only accept mail from trusted IP addresses and > > > authenticated users on port 25" > > > > > > No checkbox necessary. If you have "relay for addresses" (as you > > > stated you did) then you ALREADY REQUIRE authentication > except for > > > the IP addresses listed. RTFM. > > > > > > "Would it work if I change the alternate authentication > port 587 to > > 25 > > > in the registry?" > > > > > > For what purpose? SMTP AUTH ALREADY WORKS ON PORT 25!!! > It always > > > has. > > > Port 587 is there specifically for those clients that > can't connect > > on > > > port 25 due to their ISP's blocking that port outbound. > > > > > > Here's the thing, in your original post, you described > your setup as > > > this: relay for addresses (good), port 587 enabled > (good), but then > > > you thought you needed control access, but you didn't. > Just relay > > > for addresses and port 587 will get you EXACTLY what you want. > > > No one will > > > be able to send any mail, no matter what port they use, > unless they > > > authenticate (port 25 OR port 587), or unless they are in your > > trusted > > > IP range (port 25 only). > > > > > > Once again, please RTFM. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas > > > > Fornander > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 11:28 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Need help with configuring anti-spam > > > > > > > > > > > > It would but it doesn't change the fact (for me) that it's a > > > > workaround. > > > > > > > > Why should we have to go through all this work to move every > > > > single user to port 587 when all that is needed is a > checkbox in > > > > Imail that says "Enable strict authentication on port 25). > > > > IOW, Imail should only accept mail from trusted IP > addresses and > > > > authenticated users on port > > > > 25 when this checkbox is selected. How hard would it be for > > > > Ipswitch to implement this? I bet you can whip this out in an > > > > afternoon. You already have all the ingredience. In > this scenario > > > > we don't have to do a single change to any users and > no-one will > > > > be able to spew spam directly to Imail. There would also be no > > > > need to SPF since those sender would neither > authenticate nor send > > > > from a trusted IP. > > > > > > > > Would it work if I change the alternate authentication port > > > > 587 to 25 in the registry? What would happen? > > > > > > > > Jonas Fornander - System Administrator Netwood > Communications,LLC > > > > - www.netwood.net Find out why we're better - 310-442-1530 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Eric > > > > > Shanbrom > > > > > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 3:28 PM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Need help with configuring > anti-spam > > > > > > > > > > Since at this time there is only one ACL for the SMTP service > > this > > > > is > > > > > your problem.... my setup would be like this for this > scenario: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Router with IMGate in the DMZ > > > > > IMail server on internal network IMail relays for internal > > > > > network and requires auth on port 587 Outbound mail > to gateway > > > > > (IMGate machine) > > > > > > > > > > FW Rules: > > > > > all external port 25 traffic to DMZ no external port 25 to > > > > > internal Port 587 allowed to IMail Your users are > given port 587 > > > > > (set to require auth) for > > > > their outgong > > > > > mail > > > > > > > > > > I believe this will accomplish what you are wanting > > > > > > > > > > Eric S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonas Fornander wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >I thought I understood how to configure Imail with port > > > > 587 but now > > > > > >I'm more confused than ever. I hope someone can > un-confuse me. > > > > > >This is our setup: > > > > > > > > > > > >Our MX records points to Imgate > > > > > > > > > > > >Our hosting, DSL and dialup users has > mail.netwood.net as their > > > > > > > >outgoing server which is Imail. This server is configured > > > > to "Relay > > > > > >for addresses" and our IP blocks are listed. > > > > > > > > > > > >Our Imail is running 8.20 and port 587 is enabled and > > > > working. If I > > > > > >change my own account to use port 587 it works if I > enable "My > > > > > >outgoing server requires authentication". > > > > > > > > > > > >So everything is working as it should, sooooo now what? > > > > > > > > > > > >I thought that I would be able to go to SMTP Security -> > > Control > > > > > >Access and deny access for all IP addresses EXCEPT for > > > our trusted > > > > IP > > > > > >blocks. Then users on non-trusted IP addresses would > be able to > > > > send > > > > > >out mail using port 587 it they were authenticated. > However if > > I > > > > deny > > > > > >access to a non-trusted IP in SMTP Security -> Control > > > Access then > > > > > >they can't send out mail on port 587 either, even if they > > > > > >authenticate. :-( > > > > > > > > > > > >What am I missing? > > > > > > > > > > > >How can I make our users - on trusted IP addresses - > > > > being able to > > > > > >use mail.netwood.net to send out mail and our users - on > > > > non-trusted > > > > > >IP addresses - to send out mail on port 587 (with > > authentication) > > > > and > > > > > >ALL other mail, sent directly to the Imail server should be > > > > rejected? > > > > > > > > > > > >Jonas Fornander - System Administrator Netwood > > > > Communications,LLC - > > > > > >www.netwood.net Find out why we're better - 310-442-1530 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: > > http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > > > > > List Archive: > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > > > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > > > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release > > > > > Date: 7/9/2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release Date: > > > > 7/9/2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: > http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > > > > List Archive: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > > > List Archive: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > > > > -- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release > > > Date: 7/9/2005 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/45 - Release Date: > > 7/9/2005 > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > > List Archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ > > > To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ >
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
