The idea of having some sort of name mapping feature has been bandied
about the IMAP protocol community, but to date no final decisions have
been made. It would not be a good idea for any server implementation to
do this unilaterally, although your idea of a cf-based mapping list has
some merit.
One problem that you have not considered is that although some of these
named items have similar purposes, different clients have slightly
different semantics. This is particularly the case with Drafts, which
tend to have some client-specific metadata stashed away in the headers.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
