Joel Reicher wrote:
The idea of having some sort of name mapping feature has been bandied
about the IMAP protocol community, but to date no final decisions have
been made. It would not be a good idea for any server implementation to
do this unilaterally, although your idea of a cf-based mapping list has
some merit.
Just out of insane, stupid curiosity, what would happen with something
like an MBX format folder, which is supposed to cope with shared
access, if it were hard or soft linked to from multiple names?
Hard and soft links work fine with mbx folders and soft links with mix
folders from what I understand (and fron our usage). The sharing works
seamlessly as long as you follow all the other guidelines required for
sharing to work well without links (i.e. no NFS, etc.)
-Erik Kangas
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
