> The idea of having some sort of name mapping feature has been bandied
> about the IMAP protocol community, but to date no final decisions have
> been made. It would not be a good idea for any server implementation to
> do this unilaterally, although your idea of a cf-based mapping list has
> some merit.
Just out of insane, stupid curiosity, what would happen with something
like an MBX format folder, which is supposed to cope with shared
access, if it were hard or soft linked to from multiple names?
Cheers,
- Joel
_______________________________________________
Imap-uw mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
